Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video605 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fuel Shortages results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 298 hits. Analysis detected 1,986 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,420 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (6,439 of 16,562 topics). This Fuel Shortages is worse (more manipulative) than 61.10% of the peer group.
Fuel Shortages
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,420
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

61% percentile
025507510061.1% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.2%12.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.3%12.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.8%7.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.0%7.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.8%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Special Pleading: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos