Keyword summary
80% 66 analyzed articles/videos 48,489 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vladimir Putin results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 22,480 hits . Analysis detected 195,126 faulty-reasoning hits from 216,012 analyzed words across 65 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (30,281 of 34,832 keywords). This Vladimir Putin is better (less manipulative) than 86.90% of the peer group. Vladimir Putin
Keyword details
Total words: 216,012
Article count: 65
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.1% percentile 1.7% BS Score65 analyzed articles216K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst