Author summary
⁠91%2 analyzed articles/videos1,475 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Olivia Christie results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Overconfidence Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 1,542 hits. Analysis detected 9,427 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,629 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (1,783 of 6,316 authors). This Olivia Christie is worse (more manipulative) than 71.80% of the peer group.
Olivia Christie
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠72%Olivia Christie (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,629
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

72% percentile
025507510071.8% percentile
3.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 11.7%11.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 7.0%7.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.1%2.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 23.3%23.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.4%2.4%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 23.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 17.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 16.7%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Author 11.7%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Author 7.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.7%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Circular Reasoning: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos