Keyword summary
45% 32 analyzed articles/videos 12,399 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fires results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 7,058 hits . Analysis detected 47,970 faulty-reasoning hits from 63,597 analyzed words across 32 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 7% (33,196 of 35,638 keywords). This Fires is better (less manipulative) than 93.10% of the peer group. Fires
Keyword details
Total words: 63,597
Article count: 32
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.9% percentile 1.5% BS Score32 analyzed articles63.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst