BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50.8% saturation with 400 hits. Analysis detected 2,179 faulty-reasoning hits from 788 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 73.7% and a BS Rank of 82% (3,988 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 81.80% of the article peer group.

Smoke from wildfires  which are burning more of the Northern Hemisphere as Earth warms  attacks nearly every system in the human body, killing tens of thousands of people a year, numerous medical studies show. 
It attacks the body immediately, spiking asthma cases with increased ambulance runs within hours, swamps emergency rooms in a day or so with people suffering from heart attacks and other cardiovascular and lung issues, as well as mental health issues, doctors and scientists told The Associated Press. 
Smoke also harms pregnant women, increasing the risk of premature births and low-weight babies who could have breathing problems the rest of their lives, doctors and studies say. 
And there are long-term risks connecting prolonged smoke and other air pollution exposure to some cancers and dementia. 
So far this year, more than 5,740 square miles (more than 14,860 square kilometers) of the United States has burned from wildfires, which is 31% more than the average of the previous 10 years on this date, according to the National Interagency Fire Center. 
The amount of U.S. land burned each year in the 2020s  averaged out over a decade  is now more than twice what it was 30 years ago. 
Europe saw a record high amount of land burned in 2025, Canada has had several record or near-record fire years in the 2020s and the Arctic recently has had unprecedented levels of burning. 
“Wildfires are becoming more frequent and intense because of climate change, and when a fire happens, you have smoke,” said Colleen Reid, a University of Colorado geographic health professor. 
Most of the biggest particles in wildfire smoke fall close to where a blaze is burning, while the smallest particles  the ones that scientists say do the most damage  travel the farthest. 
In a typical wildfire, the nasty particles that harm human health are about the size of one micron, Reid said. 
Montrose said the particles can be coated in lots of chemicals and have large surface areas. 
That triggers the body’s defense system to “send signals to other cells that say, ‘We have a problem. 
We need to mount an immune response to this.’ 
And that’s where you get your acute effect or your effect within minutes, hours or even that day.” 
It’s mostly happening in the hearts and lungs, he said. 
And many people die. 
On average 24,100 people died each year in the Lower 48 states between 2006 and 2020 due to long-term exposure to tiny particles from wildfire smoke, according to a study this year in the journal Science Advances. 
A Stanford study projects that U.S. wildfire smoke deaths will increase with climate change and by midcentury hit an annual cost of $244 billion in terms of the economic value the government puts on each life. 
On a global scale, wildfire smoke particles cause 677,745 deaths annually, with almost 39% of them children under age 5, according to a 2021 study that combined observations, studies on how the body responds to the particles and computer models to calculate the toll. 
The biggest nonlethal effects have to do with the way people breathe, especially those with asthma. 
“We did a study here in 2014 after we had about two-and-a-half months of smoke off and on, because we’re in the subarctic so we’re warming at triple the global rate, so in a way we’re kind of canaries in the coal mine of the health impacts of climate change,” Howard said on a clear day from Yellowknife, Canada. 
“We found a full doubling of emergency department visits for asthma and about 50% increase in pneumonia.” 
“Even in individuals that don’t have asthma, the air can be so irritating that you could have difficulty with your respiratory system regardless,” Johnson said, “whether it’s coughing, whether it’s chest tightness, whether it’s sore throat, headache.” 
Scientists have counted at least 1,000 toxins in wildfire smoke, according to Colorado State University environmental toxicologist Luke Montrose. 
“So really it’s a big giant toxic soup of particles and gases.” 
Studies have linked smoke to people having more trouble with decision making and other cognitive issues. 
People come to the emergency room depressed, Howard said. 
That’s why it’s important to find a place with clean air  including designated shelters or libraries  to get a break from the smoke and possibly exercise, she said. 
Experts suggest people wear high-quality masks when outdoors, even though they don’t provide perfect protection. 
Inside, check windows and doors for seals, invest in a good ventilation system and check air filters, they say. 
“Staying away from the smoke is No. 1 if you can,” Johnson said. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 11.3%Seth Borenstein: 3.8%AP News: 2.0%Confirmation Bias11.3%This article: 3.7%Seth Borenstein: 7.4%AP News: 0.8%Anchoring Bias3.7%This article: 18.8%Seth Borenstein: 10.7%AP News: 2.7%Availability Heuristic18.8%This article: 10.0%Seth Borenstein: 3.3%AP News: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic10.0%This article: 0.0%Seth Borenstein: 0.0%AP News: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 18.0%Seth Borenstein: 6.0%AP News: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias18.0%This article: 23.4%Seth Borenstein: 7.8%AP News: 8.0%Framing Effect23.4%This article: 7.9%Seth Borenstein: 2.6%AP News: 0.4%Loss Aversion7.9%This article: 1.9%Seth Borenstein: 0.6%AP News: 0.5%Status Quo Bias1.9%This article: 0.0%Seth Borenstein: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Seth Borenstein: 0.0%AP News: 2.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Seth Borenstein: 2.3%AP News: 2.1%Pessimism Bias2.3%This article: 32.4%Seth Borenstein: 20.3%AP News: 9.6%Negativity Bias32.4%This article: 0.0%Seth Borenstein: 0.0%AP News: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Seth Borenstein: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Seth Borenstein: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Seth Borenstein: 0.0%AP News: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Seth Borenstein: 0.0%AP News: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Seth Borenstein: 0.0%AP News: 1.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Seth Borenstein: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Seth Borenstein: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.6%Seth Borenstein: 3.3%AP News: 1.3%Recency Bias5.6%This article: 0.0%Seth Borenstein: 0.0%AP News: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Seth Borenstein: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Seth Borenstein: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Seth Borenstein: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 50.8%Seth Borenstein: 36.9%AP News: 3.7%Appeal to Authority50.8%This article: 1.9%Seth Borenstein: 0.6%AP News: 1.2%False Dilemma1.9%This article: 0.0%Seth Borenstein: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Seth Borenstein: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 11.4%Seth Borenstein: 10.0%AP News: 2.5%Hasty Generalization11.4%This article: 0.0%Seth Borenstein: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Seth Borenstein: 0.0%AP News: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 1.5%Seth Borenstein: 3.5%AP News: 4.7%Appeal to Emotion1.5%This article: 6.1%Seth Borenstein: 2.0%AP News: 0.6%Begging the Question6.1%This article: 11.2%Seth Borenstein: 5.2%AP News: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)11.2%This article: 0.0%Seth Borenstein: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Seth Borenstein: 0.0%AP News: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 3.7%Seth Borenstein: 1.2%AP News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature3.7%This article: 4.2%Seth Borenstein: 1.4%AP News: 0.2%Composition/Division4.2%This article: 11.8%Seth Borenstein: 4.7%AP News: 1.2%Anecdotal11.8%This article: 0.0%Seth Borenstein: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 10.8%Seth Borenstein: 3.6%AP News: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)10.8%This article: 0.0%Seth Borenstein: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.6%Seth Borenstein: 0.5%AP News: 0.1%Middle Ground1.6%This article: 0.0%Seth Borenstein: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Seth Borenstein: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Seth Borenstein: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 13.8%Seth Borenstein: 4.6%AP News: 2.0%Unattributed Quote13.8%This article: 0.0%Seth Borenstein: 0.0%AP News: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 2.3%Seth Borenstein: 0.8%AP News: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice2.3%This article: 7.9%Seth Borenstein: 5.6%AP News: 0.6%Indoctrination7.9%This article: 0.0%Seth Borenstein: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Seth Borenstein: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%Seth Borenstein: 0.8%AP News: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.4%

788 words analyzed.

Speakers

7speakers52%attributed speech375writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageThe Associated Press • 47 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageNational Interagency Fire Center • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageColleen Reid • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageColleen Reid • 20 words • 0.0% coverageLuke Montrose • 16 words • 0.0% coverageLuke Montrose • 18 words • 0.0% coverageLuke Montrose • 9 words • 0.0% coverageLuke Montrose • 18 words • 0.0% coverageLuke Montrose • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageStanford University • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageHoward • 59 words • 0.0% coverageHoward • 17 words • 0.0% coverageJohnson • 37 words • 0.0% coverageLuke Montrose • 19 words • 0.0% coverageLuke Montrose • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageHoward • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageJohnson • 13 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

The Associated Press

100%flagged-word coverage
47 attributed words11% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+83.5 ptsWriter: 16.5%The Associated Press: 100.0%100.0%Indoctrination-13.1 ptsWriter: 13.1%The Associated Press: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -5.1 ptsWriter: 5.1%The Associated Press: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-1.6 ptsWriter: 1.6%The Associated Press: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.