Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Seth Borenstein results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 36.9% saturation with 873 hits . Analysis detected 3,538 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,364 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,316 authors). This Seth Borenstein is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Seth Borenstein
Author details
Total words: 2,364
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 36.9% 36.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.6% 5.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.8% 3.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 7.4% 7.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 3.6% 3.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 10.0% 10.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Authority: Author 36.9%, sitewide 11.1% Framing Effect: Author 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 20.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 10.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 4.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 5.6%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Composition/Division: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.2% Appeal to Nature: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst