Topic summary
22% 9 analyzed articles/videos 6,392 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Environmental Health results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Overconfidence Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 2,213 hits . Analysis detected 21,402 faulty-reasoning hits from 29,340 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (14,541 of 16,562 topics). This Environmental Health is better (less manipulative) than 87.80% of the peer group. Environmental Health
Topic details
Total words: 29,340
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.2% percentile 1.7% BS Score9 analyzed articles29.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst