Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 819 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jun Wang results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Overconfidence Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 400 hits . Analysis detected 2,519 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,276 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 57% (2,786 of 6,349 authors). This Jun Wang is worse (more manipulative) than 56.10% of the peer group. Jun Wang
Author details
Total words: 3,276
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.1% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.6% 5.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 12.2% 12.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.6% 7.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 12.2%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Author 7.6%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst