Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video819 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Weizhi Deng results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Overconfidence Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 400 hits. Analysis detected 2,519 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,276 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 57% (2,790 of 6,363 authors). This Weizhi Deng is worse (more manipulative) than 56.20% of the peer group.
Weizhi Deng
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
57%Weizhi Deng (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,276
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

56% percentile
025507510056.2% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.6%5.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 12.2%12.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.7%2.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 7.6%7.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 12.2%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Author 7.6%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos