Author summary
0% 11 analyzed articles/videos 10,204 analyzed words
BS Summary: These L.A. TACO STAFF results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Overconfidence Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 21.6% saturation with 6,169 hits . Analysis detected 40,235 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,585 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 59% (2,759 of 6,629 authors). This L.A. TACO STAFF is worse (more manipulative) than 58.40% of the peer group. L.A. TACO STAFF
Author details
Total words: 28,585
Article count: 11
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.4% percentile 2.9% BS Score11 analyzed articles28.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.1% 4.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 21.6% 21.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.3% 15.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 10.7% 10.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.4% 3.4% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 6.0% 6.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 8.0% 8.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 15.3%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Author 21.6%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 18.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.0%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 10.7%, sitewide 4.6% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% Bandwagon: Author 6.0%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst