Author summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 8,757 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Janette Villafana results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Halo Effect , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 4,372 hits . Analysis detected 31,472 faulty-reasoning hits from 30,293 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 43% (3,557 of 6,197 authors). This Janette Villafana is better (less manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group. Janette Villafana
Author details
Total words: 30,293
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.6% percentile 2.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles30.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.1% 7.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 7.9%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.3%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst