L.A. TACO⁠85%

Free Flautas and Fresh Beer: L.A. TACO’s Watch Party at Homage Brewing Today at 5 PM! ⁠81%

By L.A. TACO STAFF⁠0%

6/18/2026, 1:40:49 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 92.9% saturation with 170 hits. Analysis detected 645 faulty-reasoning hits from 183 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 72.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (4,135 of 21,164 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 80.50% of the article peer group.

L.A. 
TACO is throwing a big watch party at Homage Brewery for Mexico vs South Korea. 
What we are calling: The Battle for Los Angeles. 
And it’s also the official kick-off for the pre-sale of some exciting new merch we have been working on for months now. 
We’re raising funds for independent journalism with these fire limited jerseys, and this is your first chance to order one in person. 
Come through, watch the game with the crew, and support local, independent storytelling that matters and makes a difference in our fine city. 
Special guests: Los Dorados L.A., will be bringing the taco dorado energy all night long! 
L.A. 
TACO members get a free flauta! 
Just show your membership. 
Indie journalism, some of the best cold beers in L.A., free crispy taquitos, and Mexico (or South Korea!) 
kicking the ball around for 90 minutes. 
Winner gets first place! 
Come out and say what's up! 
Homage Brewing 
Today at 5 PM 
1219 N Main St, Los Angeles, CA 90012 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%L.A. TACO STAFF: 3.4%L.A. TACO: 3.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%L.A. TACO STAFF: 0.8%L.A. TACO: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 8.2%L.A. TACO STAFF: 3.4%L.A. TACO: 4.1%Availability Heuristic8.2%This article: 0.0%L.A. TACO STAFF: 1.0%L.A. TACO: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%L.A. TACO STAFF: 0.3%L.A. TACO: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%L.A. TACO STAFF: 10.7%L.A. TACO: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 26.2%L.A. TACO STAFF: 15.3%L.A. TACO: 11.6%Framing Effect26.2%This article: 15.3%L.A. TACO STAFF: 0.2%L.A. TACO: 0.6%Loss Aversion15.3%This article: 0.0%L.A. TACO STAFF: 1.5%L.A. TACO: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 12.0%L.A. TACO STAFF: 0.2%L.A. TACO: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect12.0%This article: 42.1%L.A. TACO STAFF: 3.9%L.A. TACO: 2.4%Optimism Bias42.1%This article: 0.0%L.A. TACO STAFF: 0.7%L.A. TACO: 0.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%L.A. TACO STAFF: 4.1%L.A. TACO: 11.3%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%L.A. TACO STAFF: 2.0%L.A. TACO: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%L.A. TACO STAFF: 0.6%L.A. TACO: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%L.A. TACO STAFF: 0.1%L.A. TACO: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 15.8%L.A. TACO STAFF: 8.9%L.A. TACO: 5.0%In-Group Bias15.8%This article: 0.0%L.A. TACO STAFF: 0.9%L.A. TACO: 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 22.4%L.A. TACO STAFF: 21.6%L.A. TACO: 6.0%Halo Effect22.4%This article: 0.0%L.A. TACO STAFF: 0.1%L.A. TACO: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%L.A. TACO STAFF: 0.0%L.A. TACO: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.7%L.A. TACO STAFF: 0.7%L.A. TACO: 1.0%Recency Bias7.7%This article: 5.5%L.A. TACO STAFF: 1.2%L.A. TACO: 0.4%Primacy Effect5.5%This article: 0.0%L.A. TACO STAFF: 0.0%L.A. TACO: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%L.A. TACO STAFF: 0.4%L.A. TACO: 1.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%L.A. TACO STAFF: 0.3%L.A. TACO: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%L.A. TACO STAFF: 8.0%L.A. TACO: 3.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%L.A. TACO STAFF: 0.4%L.A. TACO: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%L.A. TACO STAFF: 0.3%L.A. TACO: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%L.A. TACO STAFF: 0.1%L.A. TACO: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.8%L.A. TACO STAFF: 4.9%L.A. TACO: 5.8%Hasty Generalization9.8%This article: 0.0%L.A. TACO STAFF: 0.5%L.A. TACO: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 20.2%L.A. TACO STAFF: 6.0%L.A. TACO: 1.3%Bandwagon20.2%This article: 29.5%L.A. TACO STAFF: 18.8%L.A. TACO: 10.8%Appeal to Emotion29.5%This article: 0.0%L.A. TACO STAFF: 1.5%L.A. TACO: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%L.A. TACO STAFF: 1.0%L.A. TACO: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%L.A. TACO STAFF: 0.0%L.A. TACO: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%L.A. TACO STAFF: 0.1%L.A. TACO: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%L.A. TACO STAFF: 2.1%L.A. TACO: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%L.A. TACO STAFF: 0.1%L.A. TACO: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 8.2%L.A. TACO STAFF: 2.8%L.A. TACO: 5.8%Anecdotal8.2%This article: 0.0%L.A. TACO STAFF: 0.0%L.A. TACO: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%L.A. TACO STAFF: 0.5%L.A. TACO: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%L.A. TACO STAFF: 0.0%L.A. TACO: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%L.A. TACO STAFF: 0.0%L.A. TACO: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%L.A. TACO STAFF: 0.0%L.A. TACO: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%L.A. TACO STAFF: 0.1%L.A. TACO: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%L.A. TACO STAFF: 1.5%L.A. TACO: 0.5%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 12.0%L.A. TACO STAFF: 0.4%L.A. TACO: 1.4%Unattributed Quote12.0%This article: 0.0%L.A. TACO STAFF: 0.0%L.A. TACO: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%L.A. TACO STAFF: 5.0%L.A. TACO: 8.7%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 24.6%L.A. TACO STAFF: 0.7%L.A. TACO: 2.0%Indoctrination24.6%This article: 0.0%L.A. TACO STAFF: 0.5%L.A. TACO: 3.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%L.A. TACO STAFF: 0.0%L.A. TACO: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 92.9%L.A. TACO STAFF: 3.4%L.A. TACO: 2.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…92.9%

183 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker1.1%attributed speech181writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageHomage Brewing • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Homage Brewing

0%flagged-word coverage
2 attributed words100% of attributed speech99% writer coverage
0%47.5%95.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -93.9 ptsWriter: 93.9%Homage Brewing: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-24.9 ptsWriter: 24.9%Homage Brewing: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-12.2 ptsWriter: 12.2%Homage Brewing: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.