Topic summary
⁠35%4 analyzed articles/videos2,507 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cardiovascular Health results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 2,000 hits. Analysis detected 10,308 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,957 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (10,230 of 16,562 topics). This Cardiovascular Health is better (less manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group.
Cardiovascular Health
Topic details
Total words: 11,957
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510038.2% percentile
2.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles12K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.5%7.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 16.7%16.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.7%4.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 16.7%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos