Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Adam Frank results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 21% saturation with 270 hits. Analysis detected 2,063 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,287 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Adam Frank is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Adam Frank
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Adam Frank (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,287
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.2%7.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 17.4%17.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 9.6%9.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.6%12.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 6.6%6.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.5%4.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 8.6%8.6%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Author 6.9%6.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 21.0%21.0%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Author 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 21.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.6%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 10.0%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 8.4%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.6%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Author 7.9%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Author 6.9%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Author 6.6%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Hindsight Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.5%Personal Incredulity: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos