Author summary
16% 1 analyzed article/video 731 analyzed words
BS Summary: These EVA VAN DAM Associated Press results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Halo Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 277 hits . Analysis detected 1,862 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,924 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 64% (2,436 of 6,628 authors). This EVA VAN DAM Associated Press is worse (more manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group. EVA VAN DAM Associated Press
Author details
Total words: 2,924
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.3% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.3% 9.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.5% 9.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.5%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 7.9%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Nature: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst