Publication summary
36% 24 analyzed articles/videos 15,166 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Center for Strategic and International Studies results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 5,231 hits . Analysis detected 55,188 faulty-reasoning hits from 82,071 analyzed words across 24 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 20% (331 of 410 publications). This Center for Strategic and International Studies is better (less manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group. Center for Strategic and International Studies Publication details
Total words: 82,071
Article count: 24
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.3% percentile 1.3% BS Score24 analyzed articles82.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.5% 4.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 6.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
CSIS 36% 7/15/2026, 9:30:00 AM
CSIS 36% 7/8/2026, 10:00:00 AM
CSIS 36% 7/7/2026, 9:00:00 AM
CSIS 36% 7/2/2026, 10:00:00 AM
CSIS 36% 7/2/2026, 10:00:00 AM