Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Seth G. Jones results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Hasty Generalization , and Overconfidence Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 1,048 hits . Analysis detected 6,549 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,647 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,316 authors). This Seth G. Jones is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Seth G. Jones
Author details
Total words: 10,647
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles10.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.5%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst