Author summary
17% 1 analyzed article/video 4,583 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Byman results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Anecdotal , and False Dilemma , with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 4.5% saturation with 617 hits . Analysis detected 6,001 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,749 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 3% (6,147 of 6,316 authors). This Daniel Byman is better (less manipulative) than 97.30% of the peer group. Daniel Byman
Author details
Total words: 13,749
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.7% percentile 1.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles13.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.1% 0.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst