Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video605 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gary Peach results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 298 hits. Analysis detected 1,986 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,420 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 65% (13,353 of 37,536 keywords). This Gary Peach is worse (more manipulative) than 64.40% of the peer group.
Gary Peach
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
65%Gary Peach (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,420
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

64% percentile
025507510064.4% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.2%12.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.3%12.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.0%7.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Special Pleading: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos