Keyword summary
79% 16 analyzed articles/videos 8,473 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Moscow results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 5,206 hits . Analysis detected 44,395 faulty-reasoning hits from 42,509 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (27,324 of 35,624 keywords). This Moscow is better (less manipulative) than 76.70% of the peer group. Moscow
Keyword details
Total words: 42,509
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.3% percentile 2.0% BS Score16 analyzed articles42.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.3% 12.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst