Speaker summary
51% 28 analyzed articles/videos 1,720.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vladimir Putin results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Appeal to Authority , and Biased Writer Voice , with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 264 hits . Analysis detected 3,221.515 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,720.333 analyzed words across 28 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 2% (27,919 of 28,364 speakers). This Vladimir Putin is better (less manipulative) than 98.40% of the peer group. Vladimir Putin
Speaker details
Total words: 1,720.333
Article count: 28
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.6% percentile 4.1% BS Score28 analyzed videos1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 7.4% 7.4% Circular Reasoning Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 7.6% 7.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 2.1% 2.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 8.1% 8.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 7.1% 7.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 4.6% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 0.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 0.8% In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Begging the Question: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst