Author summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Breitbart London results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 563 hits. Analysis detected 3,659 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,088 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,360 authors). This Breitbart London is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Breitbart London
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Breitbart London (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 5,088
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 11.1%11.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.5%4.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 11.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.9%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos