Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Thomas Fazi results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.4% saturation with 1,976 hits. Analysis detected 9,758 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,480 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Thomas Fazi is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Thomas Fazi
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Thomas Fazi (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 7,480
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 26.4%26.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.5%8.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.5%4.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 13.1%13.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.9%5.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.5%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 26.4%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 13.1%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Author 11.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos