Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video605 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Russia Ukraine War Fuel Crisis Gas results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 298 hits. Analysis detected 1,986 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,420 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (13,355 of 37,536 keywords). This Russia Ukraine War Fuel Crisis Gas is worse (more manipulative) than 64.40% of the peer group.
Russia Ukraine War Fuel Crisis Gas
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 2,420
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

64% percentile
025507510064.4% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.2%12.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.3%12.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.0%7.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Special Pleading: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos