Author summary
0% 9 analyzed articles/videos 4,872 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sydney Carruth results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.6% saturation with 4,455 hits . Analysis detected 24,910 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,724 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 50% (3,233 of 6,348 authors). This Sydney Carruth is better (less manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group. Sydney Carruth
Author details
Total words: 19,724
Article count: 9
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.1% percentile 2.6% BS Score9 analyzed articles19.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.9% 13.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 22.6% 22.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.3% 7.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 22.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.3%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst