Author summary
71% 19 analyzed articles/videos 7,673 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Clarissa-Jan Lim results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 6,192 hits . Analysis detected 44,832 faulty-reasoning hits from 34,023 analyzed words across 19 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 51% (3,103 of 6,315 authors). This Clarissa-Jan Lim is worse (more manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group. Clarissa-Jan Lim
Author details
Total words: 34,023
Article count: 19
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.9% percentile 2.6% BS Score19 analyzed articles34K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.4% 14.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.3% 10.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.6% 7.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 6.1% 6.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 18.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst