MS NOW95%

Iran says Strait of Hormuz is closed, citing Israeli attacks in Lebanon 26%

By Clarissa-Jan Lim71%

6/21/2026, 12:17:44 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Hindsight Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 100 hits. Analysis detected 511 faulty-reasoning hits from 726 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 37.7% and a BS Rank of 26% (16,332 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 74.60% of the article peer group.

Iran’s military declared Saturday that the Strait of Hormuz is closed due to Israeli attacks on Hezbollah in Lebanon, The Associated Press reported citing Iranian state media, on the eve of detailed talks about a long-term peace deal. 
U.S. 
Central Command countered shortly afterward that commercial ship traffic in the strait actually increased Saturday. 
“Iran does not control the Strait of Hormuz. 
Traffic continues to flow, and U.S. forces are monitoring the situation to ensure this remains the case,” CENTCOM spokesperson Capt. 
Tim Hawkins said later, adding that the U.S. military has not tracked any movement from Iran to close the strait so far. 
Iran blamed Israel for violating a freshly announced ceasefire with Hezbollah by continuing to attack targets in Lebanon. 
The Israeli military, in turn, accused the Tehran-backed militia of breaking the terms first. 
The conflicting statements about the crucial maritime chokepoint and the state of play in Lebanon come as U.S. and Iran officials head to Switzerland to dig into specifics after landing a much-trumpeted but vague memorandum of understanding earlier this week. 
Two senior Pakistan government officials confirmed to MS NOW that Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif and Field Marshal Gen. 
Asim Munir will travel to Switzerland to join the U.S. and Iran in negotiations. 
Pakistan has been a key mediator in discussions between the warring parties. 
Access to the Strait of Hormuz, which was unfettered before the U.S. and Israel attacked Iran on Feb. 28, has been a major point of leverage for Iran in the war. 
Iran agreed to reopen the strait to commercial vessels as part of the memorandum of understanding with the U.S.; American officials had feared Iran might renege on that amid ongoing talks. 
Vice President JD Vance said Saturday morning on Fox News that there was no evidence that the strait remains closed, though he acknowledged that mines in the waterway may continue to affect commercial routes. 
It was unclear if Vance was aware of the latest reporting on the strait during his morning interview. 
Vance said special envoy Steve Witkoff and President Donald Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, had been on the ground in Switzerland “for a few hours dealing with some of the technical elements” regarding talks on implementation of the memo. 
The vice president departed for Switzerland on Saturday afternoon, shortly after the arrival of the Iranian delegation that included Parliament Speaker Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf, who posted a photo himself walking beneath a Meraj Airlines jet emblazoned with the hashtag #minab168. 
It is a reference to the number of lives lost when an airstrike hit a school in Minab, near the strait. 
U.S. intelligence agencies long ago concluded American forces were to blame, according to multiple reports, but the Pentagon has yet to acknowledge responsibility. 
Vance told reporters the parties would likely have a “couple days of talks” and said U.S. officials will be focusing on making progress on discussions about Iran’s nuclear program and the ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon. 
U.S. officials have repeatedly urged Israel to tamp down its strikes in Lebanon so as to not derail U.S. negotiations with Iran. 
Israel’s military campaign against Hezbollah has killed nearly 3,900 people since March 2, according to the Lebanese Public Health Ministry, the vast majority in southern Lebanon. 
“You don’t have to knock down an apartment house every time you’re looking for somebody,” Trump said Tuesday, chastising Israel. 
“Because there are a lot of people in those houses, and they’re not all Hezbollah.” 
A U.S. official told MS NOW on Friday that Israel and Hezbollah had agreed to a ceasefire. 
Israeli Ambassador to the U.S. 
Yichael Leiter said on X that the country halted offensive operations Friday morning local time, but Israeli forces remain in southern Lebanon to fight Hezbollah. 
Despite the ceasefire Friday, U.S. intelligence agencies believe Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is likely to continue attacking the group in Lebanon even if it hinders long-term peace negotiations between the U.S. and Iran, a U.S. official with knowledge of the matter told MS NOW. 
The U.S. intelligence assessment was first reported by The Washington Post. 
Lebanon’s civil defense agency said Saturday that Israeli strikes killed at least 16 people in the south overnight. 
The Israeli Defense Forces accused Hezbollah of firing dozens of projectiles toward soldiers in southern Lebanon. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.2%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 6.2%MS NOW: 7.5%Confirmation Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 2.1%MS NOW: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 3.2%MS NOW: 3.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 1.2%MS NOW: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 6.2%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.8%MS NOW: 1.3%Hindsight Bias6.2%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 4.3%MS NOW: 2.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 5.5%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 14.4%MS NOW: 15.4%Framing Effect5.5%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.7%MS NOW: 0.7%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.4%MS NOW: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.1%MS NOW: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.7%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 2.6%MS NOW: 2.4%Optimism Bias4.7%This article: 10.5%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 2.2%MS NOW: 3.2%Pessimism Bias10.5%This article: 9.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 18.2%MS NOW: 19.2%Negativity Bias9.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 3.7%MS NOW: 2.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 1.5%MS NOW: 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.2%MS NOW: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 4.6%MS NOW: 3.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 2.6%MS NOW: 2.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 2.9%MS NOW: 2.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 1.0%MS NOW: 1.8%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 2.2%MS NOW: 1.8%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.9%MS NOW: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.2%MS NOW: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 3.3%MS NOW: 4.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.8%MS NOW: 1.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 1.5%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 7.6%MS NOW: 5.4%Appeal to Authority1.5%This article: 3.4%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 1.1%MS NOW: 2.2%False Dilemma3.4%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.9%MS NOW: 2.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.5%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 6.1%MS NOW: 8.1%Hasty Generalization2.5%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 1.0%MS NOW: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.9%MS NOW: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 13.8%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 10.3%MS NOW: 9.8%Appeal to Emotion13.8%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 2.1%MS NOW: 2.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 4.3%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 3.0%MS NOW: 3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.3%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.7%MS NOW: 0.6%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.8%MS NOW: 0.9%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.1%MS NOW: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 3.0%MS NOW: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.1%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 2.1%MS NOW: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.1%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.1%MS NOW: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.2%MS NOW: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 1.5%MS NOW: 1.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 1.4%MS NOW: 2.5%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 1.1%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 1.5%MS NOW: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection1.1%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 3.6%MS NOW: 14.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.8%MS NOW: 2.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 2.2%MS NOW: 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.4%MS NOW: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias2.8%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

726 words analyzed.

Speakers

10speakers43%attributed speech414writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageU.S. Central Command • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageU.S. Central Command • 20 words • 0.0% coverageTim Hawkins • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageIsraeli military • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageJD Vance • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageJD Vance • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageJD Vance • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageLebanese Public Health Ministry • 26 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 20 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageYichael Leiter • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 0.0% coverageThe Washington Post • 11 words • 0.0% coverageLebanon’s civil defense agency • 18 words • 0.0% coverageIsraeli Defense Forces • 16 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Donald Trump

100%flagged-word coverage
35 attributed words11% of attributed speech52% writer coverage
0%30.0%60.0%Politically Right Leaning +57.1 ptsWriter: 0.0%Donald Trump: 57.1%57.1%Quote-first Misdirection-1.9 ptsWriter: 1.9%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.