Topic summary
72% 19 analyzed articles/videos 9,206 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Diplomacy results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 5,711 hits . Analysis detected 45,265 faulty-reasoning hits from 57,157 analyzed words across 19 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 12% (13,616 of 15,329 topics). This International Diplomacy is better (less manipulative) than 88.80% of the peer group. International Diplomacy
Topic details
Total words: 57,157
Article count: 19
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.2% percentile 1.6% BS Score19 analyzed articles57.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.0% 10.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst