Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Hanna Notte results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error , Biased Writer Voice , and Negativity Bias , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 956 hits . Analysis detected 4,461 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,885 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Hanna Notte is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Hanna Notte
Author details
Total words: 6,885
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 9.9% 9.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 13.9% 13.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 13.9%, sitewide 7.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 9.9%, sitewide 2.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.1%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.0% Slippery Slope: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.1% Horn Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst