Keyword summary
60% 3 analyzed articles/videos 998 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Iran Talks results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 599 hits . Analysis detected 5,269 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,678 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 38% (23,466 of 37,533 keywords). This US Iran Talks is better (less manipulative) than 62.50% of the peer group. US Iran Talks
Keyword details
Total words: 6,678
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.5% percentile 2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst