MS NOW95%
Judge orders DOJ to produce more unredacted Epstein files — or explain why it won’t 37%
By Clarissa-Jan Lim71% Lisa Rubin40%
6/27/2026, 1:19:15 PM
BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Unattributed Quote, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 29.7% saturation with 215 hits. Analysis detected 1,516 faulty-reasoning hits from 724 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 43.5% and a BS Rank of 37% (13,852 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 63.30% of the article peer group.
A federal judge ordered acting Attorney General Todd Blanche to produce more unredacted files related to Jeffrey Epstein or demonstrate by next week why the Justice Department was justified in withholding or redacting the files at issue.
In an order issued Thursday, U.S.
District Judge Emmet Sullivan found that Blanche “has conceded that he is in violation” of the Epstein Files Transparency Act and therefore must take steps to comply with the act or “show cause” as to why the DOJ cannot do so by July 2.
Specifically, Sullivan ordered that Blanche must remove redactions from a number of files that the Justice Department previously released, including notes from FBI interviews with a woman who accused President Donald Trump of sexually abusing her when she was a teenager after Epstein allegedly introduced them.
He must also remove redactions from documents discussing alleged co-conspirators and from emails with Epstein in which the senders’ and recipients’ identities are obscured.
And he must initiate the translation of Epstein-related documents in foreign languages and catalog the redactions made in the Epstein files.
If Blanche does not fulfill the requirements above, he must explain to the court why he cannot do so.
The court order came in response to a lawsuit filed by Katie Phang, an attorney and former MS NOW anchor.
Phang sued the DOJ in April for failing to abide by the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which Trump signed into law in November under pressure from his base, arguing that their failures to release certain information publicly made it “impossible” for her to do her job as an independent journalist.
In an interview with progressive media company MeidasTouch on Thursday, Phang emphasized that Sullivan’s court order requires Blanche to produce the documents to the public and not just to her.
“And this is why I brought this lawsuit in the beginning.
We needed this transparency as the American public, and we had to force the DOJ to have to do this,” she said.
The Justice Department’s patchy release of the files and the sloppy redactions that have concealed identities of potential co-conspirators and male associates while exposing survivors’ identifying details have been subject to intense criticism from the public.
In February, MS NOW confirmed that the Justice Department had withheld dozens of pages of FBI notes and memos from interviews with the woman who accused Trump of sexually abusing her when she was a young teenager after Epstein introduced them.
At the time, the DOJ said that no documents had been deleted but that some files were “temporarily pulled for victim redactions or to redact Personally Identifiable Information” and would subsequently be made public.
The department released three missing interview memos in early March, though the notes and other documents have still not been made public.
Trump has long denied any wrongdoing related to Epstein.
He has said that he and the late financier had a falling out in the 2000s.
In a statement to MS NOW, a DOJ spokesperson denied that Blanche conceded to violating the law, as Sullivan wrote in his order, and said the department will appeal the decision.
“Judge Sullivan’s perverse interpretation appears to be focused on driving misleading headlines.
This judge is suggesting DOJ violate the law by un-redacting victim names, who as the Department has always explained, sadly became co-conspirators,” the spokesperson said.
Blanche, who served as deputy attorney general under then-Attorney General Pam Bondi during the DOJ’s review and release of the Epstein files, has long been the face of the department’s response to the Epstein Files Transparency Act.
In January, when the DOJ released the vast majority of Epstein-related documents, Blanche — not Bondi — made that announcement.
Blanche has largely defended the DOJ’s handling of the Epstein files, though he recently admitted during congressional testimony that the department erred by publishing some victims' identifying information.
He has also acknowledged withholding millions of pages of documents that he has described as privileged or irrelevant.
He subsequently defended the DOJ’s treatment of victim-identifying information and its acknowledged withholding of documents.
Last month, Bondi testified before the House Oversight Committee that Blanche had been tasked with many key duties related to the rollout of the files.
Trump officially nominated him as attorney general earlier this month.
Speakers
2speakers10%attributed speech650writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Selected voice
100%flagged-word coverageKatie Phang
33 attributed words45% of attributed speech90% writer coverage
Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.