Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,110 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emmet Sullivan results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 821 hits . Analysis detected 4,555 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,440 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 52% (18,263 of 37,536 keywords). This Emmet Sullivan is worse (more manipulative) than 51.30% of the peer group. Emmet Sullivan
Keyword details
Total words: 4,440
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.3% percentile 2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.4% 12.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 15.5% 15.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.0% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst