Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos734 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Edwards results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 596 hits. Analysis detected 3,161 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,936 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 68% (2,061 of 6,412 authors). This David Edwards is worse (more manipulative) than 67.90% of the peer group.
David Edwards
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
68%David Edwards (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,936
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

68% percentile
025507510067.9% percentile
3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 20.3%20.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.8%4.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 17.9%17.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.9%5.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 5.1%5.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 17.9%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 20.3%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 17.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 5.1%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos