MS NOW95%

Trump signs executive order on psychedelic drugs  with Joe Rogan by his side 0%

By Clarissa-Jan Lim71%

4/18/2026, 5:00:29 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Availability Heuristic, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 27.4% saturation with 121 hits. Analysis detected 489 faulty-reasoning hits from 441 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the article peer group.

Joe Rogan truly had President Donald Trump’s back on Saturday. 
The world’s No. 1 bro-caster, who has expressed some buyer’s remorse over his endorsement of Trump, stood directly behind the president, who was seated at the Resolute Desk in the Oval Office signing an executive order to ease restrictions on medical research and treatments using psychedelic drugs. 
And it happened because of Rogan, Trump said. 
“I got a call from a number of people, including the great Joe Rogan, and he said, ‘We have to do something about this,’” Trump said. 
“And I looked into it.” 
The executive order directs the Food and Drug Administration to support clinical trials for psychedelics and speed up the process to approve drugs deemed to be safe and effective, including ibogaine, psilocybin, MDMA and LSD, all of which are illegal in the United States. 
Flanked by Rogan, Health Secretary Robert F. 
Kennedy Jr., National Institutes of Health Director Jay Bhattacharya and others, Trump said experimental treatments with psychedelics “have shown life-changing potential for those suffering from severe mental illness and depression,” including veterans. 
“If these turn out to be as good as people are saying, it’s going to have a tremendous impact,” Trump said. 
Rogan told reporters he learned about the medical benefits of psychedelics from an interview on his podcast with W. 
Bryan Hubbard, the CEO of the nonprofit Americans for Ibogaine  who stood next to Rogan in the Oval Office  and former Energy Secretary Rick Perry. 
“They told me how impactful this medicine is this and having that conversation with them, millions of people got a chance to hear their story, hear the stories of all the different people that have had life changing experiences from it,” Rogan said. 
The use of ibogaine, a psychoactive compound derived from a native African plant, has gained popularity among military veterans who have participated in clinician-guided psychedelic treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder, depression and anxiety. 
Although Rogan has criticized Trump on issues like immigration enforcement, the Epstein files and the Iran war in recent months, the two men appeared friendly at the signing on Saturday, with Trump calling the podcaster a “fantastic person.” 
The president also joked about getting ibogaine for himself as he pointed to a study that found that people who took the drug experienced a massive reduction in symptoms of depression and anxiety within a month. 
“Can I have some, please? 
I’ll take some,” he said. 
“I don’t have time to be depressed. 
You know, you stay busy enough, maybe that works too. 
That’s what I do.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 6.2%MS NOW: 7.5%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 2.1%MS NOW: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 9.8%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 3.2%MS NOW: 3.7%Availability Heuristic9.8%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 1.2%MS NOW: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.8%MS NOW: 1.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 4.3%MS NOW: 2.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 14.4%MS NOW: 15.4%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.7%MS NOW: 0.7%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.4%MS NOW: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.1%MS NOW: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 20.2%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 2.6%MS NOW: 2.4%Optimism Bias20.2%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 2.2%MS NOW: 3.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 18.2%MS NOW: 19.2%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 3.7%MS NOW: 2.4%Self-Serving Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 1.5%MS NOW: 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.2%MS NOW: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 4.6%MS NOW: 3.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 2.6%MS NOW: 2.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 27.4%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 2.9%MS NOW: 2.2%Halo Effect27.4%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 1.0%MS NOW: 1.8%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 2.2%MS NOW: 1.8%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.9%MS NOW: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.2%MS NOW: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 3.3%MS NOW: 4.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.8%MS NOW: 1.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 7.3%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 7.6%MS NOW: 5.4%Appeal to Authority7.3%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 1.1%MS NOW: 2.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.9%MS NOW: 2.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 8.2%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 6.1%MS NOW: 8.1%Hasty Generalization8.2%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 1.0%MS NOW: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 7.5%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.9%MS NOW: 0.9%Bandwagon7.5%This article: 4.8%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 10.3%MS NOW: 9.8%Appeal to Emotion4.8%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 2.1%MS NOW: 2.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 3.0%MS NOW: 3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.7%MS NOW: 0.6%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.8%MS NOW: 0.9%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.1%MS NOW: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 9.8%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 3.0%MS NOW: 2.6%Anecdotal9.8%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 2.1%MS NOW: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.1%MS NOW: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.2%MS NOW: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 1.5%MS NOW: 1.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 1.4%MS NOW: 2.5%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 1.5%MS NOW: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 12.9%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 3.6%MS NOW: 14.2%Biased Writer Voice12.9%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.8%MS NOW: 2.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 2.2%MS NOW: 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.4%MS NOW: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Clarissa-Jan Lim: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

441 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers42%attributed speech256writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 47 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 8 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 26 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 32 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 21 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Rogan • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Rogan • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 5 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 5 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 7 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 10 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 4 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Joe Rogan

69%flagged-word coverage
62 attributed words34% of attributed speech64% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Biased Writer Voice-22.3 ptsWriter: 22.3%Joe Rogan: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.