Topic summary
⁠91%4 analyzed articles/videos1,529 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Executive Order results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 1,375 hits. Analysis detected 13,181 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,552 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (5,364 of 16,562 topics). This Executive Order is worse (more manipulative) than 67.60% of the peer group.
Executive Order
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,552
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

68% percentile
025507510067.6% percentile
4.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.4%15.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 18.2%18.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.0%13.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.6%11.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 11.2%11.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.6%7.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.1%6.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 18.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos