Author summary
0% 13 analyzed articles/videos 9,178 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ken Dilanian results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.5% saturation with 7,895 hits . Analysis detected 50,412 faulty-reasoning hits from 32,241 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 61% (2,438 of 6,218 authors). This Ken Dilanian is worse (more manipulative) than 60.80% of the peer group. Ken Dilanian
Author details
Total words: 32,241
Article count: 13
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.8% percentile 3.1% BS Score13 analyzed articles32.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.9% 12.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 6.4% 6.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 24.5% 24.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.4% 12.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 8.7% 8.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 12.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 24.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.7%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 6.4%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Author 5.1%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.7% Horn Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst