Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 133 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kristine Servando results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Pessimism Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 41% saturation with 218 hits . Analysis detected 1,335 faulty-reasoning hits from 532 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.7% and a BS Rank of 98% (147 of 6,392 authors). This Kristine Servando is worse (more manipulative) than 97.70% of the peer group. Kristine Servando
Author details
Total words: 532
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
98% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 97.7% percentile 15.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles532 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 33.5% 33.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 36.6% 36.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 31.4% 31.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 41.0% 41.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 27.4% 27.4% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 12.4% 12.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Composition/Division Sitewide 0.2% Author 6.2% 6.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 6.4% 6.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 41.0%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 36.6%, sitewide 5.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 33.5%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 31.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 27.4%, sitewide 8.1% Framing Effect: Author 27.1%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Slippery Slope: Author 12.4%, sitewide 1.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.4%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 2.7% Composition/Division: Author 6.2%, sitewide 0.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 5.1%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst