Topic summary
46% 20 analyzed articles/videos 27,116 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Conspiracy Theories results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 13,809 hits . Analysis detected 128,435 faulty-reasoning hits from 147,734 analyzed words across 20 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (14,097 of 15,758 topics). This Conspiracy Theories is better (less manipulative) than 89.50% of the peer group. Conspiracy Theories
Topic details
Total words: 147,734
Article count: 20
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.5% percentile 1.6% BS Score20 analyzed articles147.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst