Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,371 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jacqueline Alemany results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 1,459 hits . Analysis detected 10,334 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,196 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 62% (2,471 of 6,346 authors). This Jacqueline Alemany is worse (more manipulative) than 61.10% of the peer group. Jacqueline Alemany
Author details
Total words: 8,196
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.1% percentile 3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.0% 11.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.5% 11.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 12.1% 12.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Author 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 17.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 12.1%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst