Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,983 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Caroline Delbert results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Anecdotal , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 1,056 hits . Analysis detected 8,373 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,932 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 20% (4,969 of 6,170 authors). This Caroline Delbert is better (less manipulative) than 80.50% of the peer group. Caroline Delbert
Author details
Total words: 11,932
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.5% percentile 1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.0% 0.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.7% 2.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst