Author summary
0%5 analyzed articles/videos3,892 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stacy Liberatore results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 1,220 hits. Analysis detected 12,243 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,800 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 28% (4,450 of 6,138 authors). This Stacy Liberatore is better (less manipulative) than 72.50% of the peer group.
Stacy Liberatore
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
28%Stacy Liberatore (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 14,800
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

28% percentile
025507510027.5% percentile
1.9% BS Score5 analyzed articles14.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.1%7.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.2%5.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.1%0.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.0%5.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.7%3.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Author 8.2%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.1%Slippery Slope: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate