NASA's Artemis II enters '13 minutes of terror' as crew plunges through Earth's atmosphere in radio blackout 1%

By Stacy Liberatore0% Chris Melore0%

4/10/2026, 10:35:11 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 112 hits. Analysis detected 752 faulty-reasoning hits from 785 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 1% (21,177 of 21,192 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 99.90% of the article peer group.

NASA's Artemis II crew is just minutes away from the most dangerous phase of their historic Moon mission as the Orion spacecraft prepares to plunge back to Earth. 
The spacecraft is scheduled to streak through Earth's atmosphere at about 7.53pm ET on Friday, reaching blistering speeds of up to 25,000 miles per hour before splashing down roughly 13 minutes later in the Pacific Ocean off the coast of San Diego, California. 
The four-person crew, NASA astronauts Reid Wiseman, Victor Glover and Christina Koch, along with Canadian astronaut Jeremy Hansen, is wrapping up a ten-day mission that carried them around the moon and farther than any human had ever traveled into space before. 
The journey marked the first time in more than 50 years that humans have traveled this far into space and viewed the lunar surface with the naked eye since the Apollo era. 
During the mission, the astronauts also passed behind the moon, flying over the mysterious far side, often referred to as the moon's dark side because it permanently faces away from Earth. 
The historic flight also shattered a decades-old distance record set during Apollo 13 in 1970, when astronauts traveled 248,655 miles from Earth. 
Artemis II surpassed that milestone by thousands of miles, setting a new distance record for human spaceflight. 
Orion’s crew module has successfully separated from the service module, and the final maneuver to angle Artemis II for a safe reentry into Earth's atmosphere has been completed. 
NASA has confirmed that the return of Artemis II will now continue with no other changes in the scheduled splashdown in the Pacific Ocean at approximately 8.07pm ET. 
NASA cautioned that the crew module will lose contact with the space agency for six minutes as it enters the atmosphere. 
Captain Erik Kenny, the commanding officer of the US Navy's USS John P Murtha revealed that the ship has launched the four helicopters which will be monitoring the splashdown site as Artemis II nears Earth's atmosphere. 
The Murtha set out from the California coast earlier in the week for its mission to recovery the Orion spacecraft is less than one hour. 
NASA flight surgeon Dr Rick Scheuring revealed that crews at the splashdown site are preparing to help the four astronauts, who may battle severe nausea after reentering Earth's much stronger atmosphere. 
Scheuring said: 'The human system is very dynamic. 
It has to readapt very quickly. 
One of the most common responses they get is some stomach awareness, to some nausea, to some vomiting.' 
To help NASA astronauts Reid Wiseman, Victor Glover and Christina Koch, and Canadian astronaut Jeremy Hansen, the crew has taken anti-nausea medication and increasing their fluid intake in preparation for splashdown. 
NASA astronauts Reid Wiseman, Victor Glover and Christina Koch, and Canadian astronaut Jeremy Hansen have changed into their protective space suits as the crew begin their final leak checks before entering the Earth's atmosphere at approximately 7.33pm ET 
NASA's Artemis mission recovery director, Paul Sierpinski, said that the conditions near the splashdown site look great and everything remains on schedule for the Orion spacecraft to return in just over an hour. 
NASA has released its official timeline of what will happen during Artemis II's historic return to Earth: 
7.33pm ET: Orion’s crew module will separate from the service module, exposing its heat shield for the spacecraft’s return through Earth’s atmosphere, where temperatures will reach up to 3,000 degrees Fahrenheit. 
7.37pm ET: Orion will perform an 18-second crew module raise burn beginning to set the proper entry angle and align the heat shield for its collision with the atmosphere. 
7.53pm ET: When Orion reaches 400,000 feet above Earth’s surface, the crew is expected to experience up to 3.9 Gs in the planned entry route. 
This moment marks the spacecraft’s first contact with the upper atmosphere and the starts a six-minute communications blackout. 
8.03pm ET: Around 22,000 feet over the surface, parachutes will deploy, slowing and stabilizing the capsule as Orion nears splashdown. 
8.04pm ET: At around 6,000 feet, the initial parachutes will release, and the three main parachutes will deploy, reducing Orion’s speed to less than 136 mph. 
8.07pm ET: Slowing to 20 mph, Orion will splash down in the Pacific Ocean off the coast of San Diego, completing the Artemis II crew’s return to Earth and a 694,481-mile journey. 
The Orion spacecraft carrying four astronauts back to Earth successfully completed their final burn Friday afternoon at 2.53pm ET. 
The capsule ignited its thrusters for eight seconds, changing their velocity by 4.2 feet-per-second and pushing Artemis II into a course that will take it safely into the Pacific Ocean at approximately 8.07pm ET. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.0%Stacy Liberatore: 3.7%Daily Mail: 3.7%Confirmation Bias6.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Liberatore: 0.9%Daily Mail: 1.0%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 7.5%Stacy Liberatore: 1.9%Daily Mail: 3.5%Availability Heuristic7.5%This article: 3.9%Stacy Liberatore: 0.9%Daily Mail: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic3.9%This article: 4.1%Stacy Liberatore: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.8%Hindsight Bias4.1%This article: 0.0%Stacy Liberatore: 3.2%Daily Mail: 1.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 5.7%Stacy Liberatore: 4.3%Daily Mail: 9.1%Framing Effect5.7%This article: 0.0%Stacy Liberatore: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 2.7%Stacy Liberatore: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.4%Status Quo Bias2.7%This article: 0.0%Stacy Liberatore: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 10.7%Stacy Liberatore: 0.9%Daily Mail: 2.3%Optimism Bias10.7%This article: 7.5%Stacy Liberatore: 4.8%Daily Mail: 1.2%Pessimism Bias7.5%This article: 4.5%Stacy Liberatore: 7.1%Daily Mail: 12.7%Negativity Bias4.5%This article: 4.2%Stacy Liberatore: 0.0%Daily Mail: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias4.2%This article: 0.0%Stacy Liberatore: 0.0%Daily Mail: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Liberatore: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Liberatore: 0.1%Daily Mail: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Liberatore: 0.9%Daily Mail: 1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%Stacy Liberatore: 0.5%Daily Mail: 4.5%Halo Effect2.8%This article: 0.0%Stacy Liberatore: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.5%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Liberatore: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Liberatore: 1.5%Daily Mail: 1.6%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Liberatore: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Liberatore: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Liberatore: 0.5%Daily Mail: 1.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Liberatore: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 14.3%Stacy Liberatore: 5.0%Daily Mail: 4.0%Appeal to Authority14.3%This article: 0.0%Stacy Liberatore: 1.0%Daily Mail: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Liberatore: 3.4%Daily Mail: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Liberatore: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.3%Stacy Liberatore: 5.7%Daily Mail: 4.3%Hasty Generalization2.3%This article: 0.0%Stacy Liberatore: 0.6%Daily Mail: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Liberatore: 1.8%Daily Mail: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 5.7%Stacy Liberatore: 5.2%Daily Mail: 7.6%Appeal to Emotion5.7%This article: 0.0%Stacy Liberatore: 1.2%Daily Mail: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Liberatore: 0.7%Daily Mail: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Liberatore: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Liberatore: 2.2%Daily Mail: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Liberatore: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Liberatore: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Liberatore: 8.2%Daily Mail: 3.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Liberatore: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.9%Stacy Liberatore: 2.4%Daily Mail: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.9%This article: 0.0%Stacy Liberatore: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Liberatore: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Liberatore: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Liberatore: 0.6%Daily Mail: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Liberatore: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Liberatore: 3.9%Daily Mail: 3.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 1.0%Stacy Liberatore: 1.9%Daily Mail: 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection1.0%This article: 8.9%Stacy Liberatore: 3.3%Daily Mail: 9.3%Biased Writer Voice8.9%This article: 0.0%Stacy Liberatore: 1.6%Daily Mail: 0.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Liberatore: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Liberatore: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Liberatore: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

785 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers8.3%attributed speech720writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageRick Scheuring • 8 words • 100.0% coverageRick Scheuring • 6 words • 0.0% coverageRick Scheuring • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coveragePaul Sierpinski • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Paul Sierpinski

100%flagged-word coverage
33 attributed words51% of attributed speech59% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Biased Writer Voice-9.7 ptsWriter: 9.7%Paul Sierpinski: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.