Speaker summary
52% 22 analyzed articles/videos 917 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nancy Pelosi results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 239.703 hits . Analysis detected 2,107.712 faulty-reasoning hits from 917 analyzed words across 22 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 3% (27,718 of 28,364 speakers). This Nancy Pelosi is better (less manipulative) than 97.70% of the peer group. Nancy Pelosi
Speaker details
Total words: 917
Article count: 22
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.3% percentile 4.8% BS Score22 analyzed videos917 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 9.1% 9.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 0.9% 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 7.7% 7.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 14.4% 14.4% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 7.5% 7.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 4.8% 4.8% Circular Reasoning Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 20.3% 20.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 20.3%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 1.7% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Bandwagon: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 0.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 0.9% Ad Hominem: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst