Author summary
96% 1 analyzed article/video 1,359 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Scobell results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Pessimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.6% saturation with 1,084 hits . Analysis detected 6,037 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,077 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 78% (1,489 of 6,498 authors). This Andrew Scobell is worse (more manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group. Andrew Scobell
Author details
Total words: 4,077
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 77.1% percentile 4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 19.6% 19.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 16.6% 16.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 9.5% 9.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 26.6% 26.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 6.8% 6.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 26.6%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 19.6%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 16.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 9.5%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 9.1%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 6.1%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Slippery Slope: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst