Author summary
90% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,312 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrea Ghiselli results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Biased Writer Voice , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 1,605 hits . Analysis detected 12,333 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,936 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 56% (2,929 of 6,628 authors). This Andrea Ghiselli is worse (more manipulative) than 55.80% of the peer group. Andrea Ghiselli
Author details
Total words: 9,936
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.8% percentile 2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.9% 10.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 13.1% 13.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 8.2% 8.2% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 6.2% 6.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 13.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.9%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.2%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Author 6.2%, sitewide 1.5% Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst