Author summary
84%1 analyzed article/video1,953 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mohammed Alsudairi results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 700 hits. Analysis detected 6,296 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,859 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 61% (2,435 of 6,215 authors). This Mohammed Alsudairi is worse (more manipulative) than 60.80% of the peer group.
Mohammed Alsudairi
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
61%Mohammed Alsudairi (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,859
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

61% percentile
025507510060.8% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.9%8.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.0%1.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 7.5%7.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 11.9%11.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 7.6%7.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.9%2.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Author 11.9%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 10.7%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.6%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Author 7.5%, sitewide 1.5%Halo Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos