Author summary
42% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,953 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aaron Glasserman results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Hasty Generalization , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 1,836 hits . Analysis detected 12,856 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,707 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 39% (3,900 of 6,350 authors). This Aaron Glasserman is better (less manipulative) than 61.40% of the peer group. Aaron Glasserman
Author details
Total words: 13,707
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.6% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles13.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.4% 13.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 5.7% 5.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.6%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.7%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst