Author summary
⁠83%3 analyzed articles/videos1,902 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Nichols results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 20.2% saturation with 1,969 hits. Analysis detected 15,377 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,762 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (1,877 of 6,427 authors). This John Nichols is worse (more manipulative) than 70.80% of the peer group.
John Nichols
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠71%John Nichols (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,762
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

71% percentile
025507510070.8% percentile
3.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.6%6.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 20.2%20.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 17.2%17.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.8%8.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.1%4.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 4.9%4.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.0%2.0%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 5.5%5.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.1%0.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 12.1%12.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.6%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 20.2%, sitewide 2.0%Negativity Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Straw Man: Author 5.5%, sitewide 0.9%Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Author 4.9%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos