Author summary
46% 2 analyzed articles/videos 453 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lauren Green results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Anchoring Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 542 hits . Analysis detected 4,690 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,251 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 53% (3,044 of 6,348 authors). This Lauren Green is worse (more manipulative) than 52.10% of the peer group. Lauren Green
Author details
Total words: 4,251
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.1% percentile 2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.8% 12.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.2% 11.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 7.0% 7.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 12.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 4.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.7%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 7.0%, sitewide 0.8% In-Group Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.4%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst