Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 453 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hailey Bullis results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and False Dilemma , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 203 hits . Analysis detected 1,696 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,812 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 62% (2,442 of 6,359 authors). This Hailey Bullis is worse (more manipulative) than 61.60% of the peer group. Hailey Bullis
Author details
Total words: 1,812
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.6% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.2% 11.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.2% 10.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 7.3% 7.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 7.0% 7.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.5% 9.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.5%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% False Dilemma: Author 7.3%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 7.0%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Circular Reasoning: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.1% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst